<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wooden Birds reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://illinoisentertainer.com/2009/06/the-wooden-birds-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://illinoisentertainer.com/2009/06/the-wooden-birds-reviewed/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Chicagoland's Free Music Monthly Magazine - In Print And Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:49:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://illinoisentertainer.com/2009/06/the-wooden-birds-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-86025</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illinoisentertainer.com/?p=5260#comment-86025</guid>
		<description>If you gave the song anything resembling a close listen you would hear that it&#039;s quite obviously &quot;She was 7 when i was 17&quot;...even if you understandably misheard the line in the chorus, the rest of the song is in very explicit terms telling the story of a guy who sees a girl who&#039;d grown up since he last saw her as a child. I have no problem when I read a bad review of something I like, but I find to be extemely insulting and disrespectful to the artist when it&#039;s made painfully clear that the reviewer gave at best a half-ass listen to then just tear it down. The fact that you think he&#039;s mostly known for one EP with a now-famous guy rather than for heading up one of the most beloved indie rock bands of the late 90&#039;s/early 00&#039;s who were the influence on Mr. Gibbard, not the other way around, is even more embarrassing...do some actual listening and just a SLIGHT amount of research, jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you gave the song anything resembling a close listen you would hear that it&#8217;s quite obviously &#8220;She was 7 when i was 17&#8243;&#8230;even if you understandably misheard the line in the chorus, the rest of the song is in very explicit terms telling the story of a guy who sees a girl who&#8217;d grown up since he last saw her as a child. I have no problem when I read a bad review of something I like, but I find to be extemely insulting and disrespectful to the artist when it&#8217;s made painfully clear that the reviewer gave at best a half-ass listen to then just tear it down. The fact that you think he&#8217;s mostly known for one EP with a now-famous guy rather than for heading up one of the most beloved indie rock bands of the late 90&#8217;s/early 00&#8217;s who were the influence on Mr. Gibbard, not the other way around, is even more embarrassing&#8230;do some actual listening and just a SLIGHT amount of research, jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

